May 15th, on an informal BlogTalkRadio show the discussion was with John Brown, a logistics expert in Tucson and Edgardo Cabrera a Mexican logistics expert on the commercial transportation between Mexico and the US. They discussed the issue of trucks, trains and water transportation between the two countries and what is working and what needs more attention.
From the table below you can see the progress of the surface transportation, truck, rail and pipelines. Obviously, trucks are the majority of methods of transport. There is an expected increase in pipeline over the coming years due to liquid natural gas (LNG) ports being developed. I also added the second table to show how the destinations go far beyond the border region.
Table 6. U.S. Merchandise Trade with Mexico by Surface Modes of Transportation
(millions of dollars)
|
Mode |
|
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
Percent Change 2005-2006 |
Percent Change 2006-2007 |
|
All Surface Modes |
Imports |
135,400 |
155,205 |
167,713 |
14.6 |
8.1 |
|
Exports |
104,277 |
116,749 |
118,758 |
12.0 |
1.7 |
|
|
Total |
239,677 |
271,954 |
286,472 |
13.5 |
5.3 |
|
|
Truck |
Imports |
112,268 |
126,464 |
137,037 |
12.6 |
8.4 |
|
Exports |
83,341 |
92,992 |
93,047 |
11.6 |
0.1 |
|
|
Rail |
Imports |
20,782 |
25,864 |
27,060 |
24.5 |
4.6 |
|
Exports |
15,748 |
17,271 |
19,340 |
9.7 |
12.0 |
|
|
Pipeline |
Imports |
0 |
55 |
169 |
NA |
204.5 |
|
Exports |
543 |
707 |
787 |
30.2 |
11.4 |
Source: BTS TransBorder Surface Freight Dataset, http://www.bts.gov/transborder/
Note: The value of all surface modes is not equal to the sum of truck, rail and pipeline modes. The value of trade for all surface modes includes shipments made by truck, rail, pipeline, mail, foreign trade zones, other and unknown modes of transportation. For additional detail refer to the TransBorder Surface Freight data “Sources and Reliability” statement: http://www.bts.gov/ntda/tbscd/srfin.html; Numbers may not add to totals due to rounding.NA – not applicable
Table 7. Top 10 States Trading with Mexico by Surface Modes of Transportation in 2007, Ranked by Surface Trade Value
(millions of dollars)
|
Rank |
State |
2007 |
|
1 |
Texas |
87,782 |
|
2 |
California |
49,198 |
|
3 |
Michigan |
30,783 |
|
4 |
Arizona |
10,177 |
|
5 |
Illinois |
10,133 |
|
6 |
Ohio |
6,911 |
|
7 |
Tennessee |
6,487 |
|
8 |
North Carolina |
5,448 |
|
9 |
New York |
5,229 |
|
10 |
Pennsylvania |
5,196 |
We all have read and heard about border issues such as immigration, drugs and violence. What many fail to realize is that the proposed and deployed remedies for these issues have an effect on commerce. Half day waits and the certification of drivers on both sides are two of the major issues. This has effected delivery dates and creates all types of logistic issues. John Brown, on the broadcast, discusses how Tucson-Nogales has streamlined things a bit and that is a start. There are also strategies on using other types of transport more, but as we learned from the broadcast, these as issues as well.
The threat is real for both sides. For the United States there is the threat of loss of trade with Mexico, you can see from the tables below, this is substantial trade. For Mexico, they will be forced to look at other trading partners. China’s trade with Mexico is now at $11B annually and growing. In fact there are many cross country programs in effect right now. Relations with other countries are growing as well.
The show discusses some of the issues and solutions that both countries need to deal with now. This region is the fastest growing region for both countries. It is so amazing that while the rest of the United States continues to deal with media pressure, the border is forced to deal with the real issues that have real consequences to the United States.
|
Month |
Exports |
Imports |
Balance |
|
January 2008 |
11,878.3 |
17,019.6 |
-5,141.2 |
|
February 2008 |
12,220.1 |
17,717.2 |
-5,497.1 |
|
March 2008 |
11,717.5 |
17,691.9 |
-5,974.4 |
|
TOTAL |
35,816.0 |
52,428.6 |
-16,612.7 |
NOTE: All figures are in millions of U.S. dollars.
|
Month |
Exports |
Imports |
Balance |
|
January 2007 |
10,745.0 |
15,327.4 |
-4,582.5 |
|
February 2007 |
10,056.4 |
15,136.9 |
-5,080.5 |
|
March 2007 |
11,573.6 |
18,284.7 |
-6,711.1 |
|
April 2007 |
10,988.8 |
16,203.4 |
-5,214.6 |
|
May 2007 |
12,054.6 |
17,925.7 |
-5,871.1 |
|
June 2007 |
11,616.8 |
18,002.5 |
-6,385.7 |
|
July 2007 |
11,186.2 |
16,805.4 |
-5,619.2 |
|
August 2007 |
12,302.3 |
19,248.9 |
-6,946.6 |
|
September 2007 |
11,326.3 |
17,628.3 |
-6,302.1 |
|
October 2007 |
12,356.0 |
19,820.6 |
-7,464.5 |
|
November 2007 |
12,103.4 |
19,672.6 |
-7,569.2 |
|
December 2007 |
10,231.9 |
16,742.6 |
-6,510.8 |
|
TOTAL |
136,541.3 |
210,799.0 |
-74,257.8 |
- ‘TOTAL’ may not add due to rounding.
- Table reflects only those months for which there was trade.
- CONTACT: Data Dissemination Branch, U.S. Census Bureau, (301) 763-2311
- SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division, Data Dissemination Branch, Washington, D.C. 20233
Trade with Mexico : 2006
NOTE: All figures are in millions of U.S. dollars.
|
Month |
Exports |
Imports |
Balance |
|
January 2006 |
10,503.4 |
15,227.9 |
-4,724.5 |
|
February 2006 |
10,050.8 |
14,820.1 |
-4,769.3 |
|
March 2006 |
11,968.0 |
17,363.4 |
-5,395.5 |
|
April 2006 |
10,772.5 |
15,665.3 |
-4,892.8 |
|
May 2006 |
11,569.6 |
17,154.6 |
-5,584.9 |
|
June 2006 |
11,714.6 |
17,787.3 |
-6,072.8 |
|
July 2006 |
10,408.1 |
15,464.5 |
-5,056.4 |
|
August 2006 |
11,735.3 |
18,038.7 |
-6,303.5 |
|
September 2006 |
11,009.0 |
16,897.5 |
-5,888.5 |
|
October 2006 |
12,409.9 |
17,515.2 |
-5,105.4 |
|
November 2006 |
11,776.5 |
17,246.6 |
-5,470.0 |
|
December 2006 |
10,061.2 |
15,072.1 |
-5,010.9 |
|
TOTAL |
133,978.8 |
198,253.2 |
-64,274.3 |
- ‘TOTAL’ may not add due to rounding.
- Table reflects only those months for which there was trade.
- CONTACT: Data Dissemination Branch, U.S. Census Bureau, (301) 763-2311
- SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division, Data Dissemination Branch, Washington, D.C. 20233
Trade with Mexico : 2005
NOTE: All figures are in millions of U.S. dollars.
|
Month |
Exports |
Imports |
Balance |
|
January 2005 |
9,217.1 |
12,073.9 |
-2,856.8 |
|
February 2005 |
9,010.1 |
12,607.1 |
-3,597.0 |
|
March 2005 |
9,914.4 |
14,114.4 |
-4,200.0 |
|
April 2005 |
9,840.0 |
14,281.7 |
-4,441.7 |
|
May 2005 |
9,929.3 |
14,413.5 |
-4,484.1 |
|
June 2005 |
10,113.5 |
14,848.6 |
-4,735.1 |
|
July 2005 |
9,220.3 |
12,710.2 |
-3,489.9 |
|
August 2005 |
10,665.2 |
14,895.6 |
-4,230.4 |
|
September 2005 |
10,284.5 |
14,517.6 |
-4,233.1 |
|
October 2005 |
10,961.0 |
15,720.3 |
-4,759.3 |
|
November 2005 |
10,978.6 |
15,499.1 |
-4,520.5 |
|
December 2005 |
10,230.7 |
14,426.7 |
-4,196.0 |
|
TOTAL |
120,364.8 |
170,108.6 |
-49,743.8 |
Mexico, China to push forward bilateral investment agreement
From: CHINA VIEW
March 23, 2007 13:01 Beijing Time
MEXICO CITY, March 22 (Xinhua) — Mexico and China will seek important progress towards signing a reciprocal investment promotion agreement before the end of 2007, Mexico’s Secretary of Economy Eduardo Sojo said in the opening session of the 15th Mexico-China Plenary Meeting on Thursday.
“There is a great deal of interest for the current government to achieve this agreement with the Asian nation,” Sojo said in the meeting, organized by the Mexican Council to promote foreign trade, investment and cooperation in technology.
“We are just beginning the negotiation process with China, hoping for a second meeting next July,” Sojo said.
He said Mexican state governments are negotiating with Chinese provincial governments on some auto projects to receive investments this year.
Official figures show that the bilateral trade volume has increased from around 13 million U.S. dollars in 1972 when Mexico-China ties were formed to more than 11.4 billion dollars in 2006.







0 Responses to “LOGISTICS ALONG THE FASTEST GROWING REGION FOR BOTH THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO”